In my previous article on What Successful Expansion into Africa Increasingly Requires, I briefly introduced the DAM Framework, a strategic framework I have relied on for years to build brands and businesses across different industries and markets. While I originally developed the framework to examine how enduring brands and businesses are built, applying it across industries revealed something even more interesting. The same sequence consistently explained far more than branding or market entry. I found the same pattern whether I was thinking about a product launch, a new market, a personal brand, a growing business, or an institution.
Applying the framework across industries also reinforced one conclusion more consistently than any other. Across the businesses, brands, and markets I have studied and worked with, the strongest monetisation stories rarely begin with monetisation itself. Instead, they first became meaningful to the people they hoped to serve. Relevance came before the ask. Trust developed before the transaction became the focus, and the relationship was already taking shape before the organisation tried to capture its full economic value. That sequence lies at the heart of the DAM Framework.
Apple provides one of the clearest illustrations of this pattern. Today, it is one of the world’s most valuable companies, with products and services embedded in the daily lives of millions of people. Its influence extends well beyond computers into smartphones, wearables, entertainment, financial services, health, and increasingly, entirely new computing experiences. Every major product launch attracts global attention, and customers routinely place their trust in categories that would once have seemed far removed from Apple’s original business.
Viewed through today’s lens, this expansion can appear almost inevitable. It was anything but that. Apple began as a computer company, and few would have predicted four decades ago that consumers would eventually trust it to manage their health data, facilitate financial transactions, produce television content, or introduce entirely new computing platforms. Yet Apple’s success was never simply a function of producing more products. Over decades, Apple built an asset that went well beyond its portfolio of devices: a relationship with customers that could travel across categories. Its design philosophy became distinctive, and customers came to associate Apple with a particular standard of design and experience that went beyond any single product. Long before Apple entered new markets, millions of consumers had already accepted the brand into their lives.
Read also: Liberia’s rule of law risk and a contract with the caveat
Through the DAM lens, that distinction matters: Apple’s expansion was built not on product alone, but on permission accumulated over time. Each successful product strengthened the relationship and expanded the range of problems customers trusted Apple to solve. Moving from computers into music, from music into smartphones, and later into payments, entertainment, health, and financial services became progressively more credible because the underlying relationship already existed. Innovation remained essential, but innovation alone does not explain why customers were willing to follow Apple into entirely new categories.
Apple had earned permission to enter more of its customers’ lives. That permission, accumulated over decades, became a competitive advantage in its own right. A remarkably similar pattern appears in a completely different context.
When Rihanna launched Fenty Beauty in 2017, many observers viewed it as another celebrity beauty brand. Given how frequently celebrities attach their names to consumer products, that seemed like a reasonable conclusion. Visibility can generate initial demand, but it rarely creates enduring businesses.
Fenty had something more valuable than celebrity: cultural credibility. That credibility had been built long before she entered the beauty industry. Through her music, fashion, and public identity, she established herself as a cultural tastemaker whose influence extended well beyond entertainment. More importantly, she consistently represented confidence, individuality, inclusivity, and self-expression in ways her audience experienced as authentic rather than manufactured. Over time, she developed a relationship with her audience that extended beyond admiration to trust.
When Fenty Beauty launched in 2017 with one of the industry’s most inclusive foundation ranges, the product gave tangible form to values Rihanna had embodied for years. The proposition felt credible because consumers had already seen Rihanna stand for those ideas. Savage X Fenty later carried that same philosophy of confidence, inclusivity, and self-expression into another category.
Fenty Beauty generated substantial revenue, but revenue was the outcome rather than the origin of its success. The business was built on a relationship Rihanna had cultivated long before Fenty existed. Products can generate transactions. Relationships are what give those transactions the potential to endure. That distinction explains why some brands sustain momentum long after their initial launch while others struggle to move beyond early success.
The transfer of trust from Rihanna the artist to Rihanna the entrepreneur did not happen because she entered a new industry. It happened because consumers already believed in the person behind the brand. The industry changed. The relationship did not.
The same pattern becomes equally visible when organisations enter entirely new markets.
Starbucks’ expansion into China is often described as one of the company’s greatest international growth stories. What is less frequently discussed is how that growth was created. When Starbucks entered China in 1999, it was not entering an established coffee culture comparable to the United States or Europe. Coffee consumption remained relatively low, tea dominated everyday consumption habits, and many questioned whether a premium coffee retailer could ever achieve meaningful scale in a predominantly tea-drinking market. Had Starbucks simply replicated the business model that had made it successful elsewhere, its trajectory in China would likely have been very different.
Instead, Starbucks spent its early years building the market before attempting to maximise it. The company adapted elements of its menu to local tastes, introducing tea-based beverages alongside its coffee offerings. It invested in stores designed as social destinations, adapting Starbucks’ ‘third place’ concept through locally relevant design and creating settings where people could meet, work, and spend time together. Starbucks was therefore introducing consumers to more than coffee. It was giving them a reason to value the experience around it.
As the brand became more familiar, Starbucks continued investing in the relationship rather than simply expanding its footprint. It introduced digital ordering, delivery, and loyalty programmes and continued refining the customer experience as it expanded into hundreds of cities. By the time Starbucks opened its 30,000-square-foot Shanghai Reserve Roastery in 2017, it was no longer introducing itself to Chinese consumers. It was reinforcing a relationship that had already been built. The Roastery was designed as an immersive destination featuring an on-site coffee roastery, a Teavana tea bar, interactive digital experiences developed with Alibaba, and design elements celebrating Chinese craftsmanship. It deepened the brand’s premium positioning and strengthened the emotional connection customers already had with Starbucks.
Monetisation accelerated because Desire had already been established and Affinity had already been earned. China would go on to become Starbucks’ second-largest market globally, with thousands of stores across hundreds of cities. Even the company’s more recent competitive pressure from domestic brands such as Luckin Coffee reinforces the same lesson. Desire and affinity are not permanent assets. Markets evolve, competitors emerge, and customer expectations change, which means both capabilities must be renewed. A new market, category, generation of customers, or competitive shift can require an organisation to earn them again.
Starbucks did not build one of its largest international businesses by selling more coffee. It built a market by first becoming relevant within it.
The lesson extends far beyond Starbucks. Market entry is rarely just about introducing a product or replicating a model that succeeded elsewhere. Global Desire does not automatically equal local Desire, and global Affinity does not automatically equal local Affinity. An organisation may enter a market with considerable recognition, credibility, and brand equity but still need an effective localisation strategy to establish local relevance, demonstrate authenticity within a different cultural context, and earn trust with a new audience. The strategic question is therefore not simply whether an organisation has a strong brand, but how much of that strength transfers into a new market and how much must be earned again.
Apple, Rihanna, and Starbucks faced fundamentally different strategic challenges: expanding into new categories, translating a personal brand into businesses, and establishing relevance in a new market. Their differences are what make the comparison useful. DAM is not dependent on a particular industry, product, or commercial model. Across each case, the same sequence appears: establish relevance, deepen the relationship, then capture the economic value that relationship makes possible.
Read also: What your email reveals about your leadership (4)
That recurring pattern led me to formalise the DAM Framework, a strategic framework for creating long-term value across organisations, markets and personal brands. The DAM Framework argues that long-term value is built through three capabilities over time and that the order in which they develop matters.
First comes Desire, which answers a simple but fundamental question.
Why should I care?
Desire is an organisation’s capability to establish relevance, authenticity, credibility, and aspiration. Whether the audience is a customer, employee, investor, or community, engagement begins with the same judgement: does this organisation and what it represents matter to me? Desire establishes that initial emotional and strategic connection. It gives people a compelling reason to pay attention long before they are ever asked to make a purchase, invest, advocate, or participate.
Second comes Affinity, which answers an equally important question.
Why should I stay?
Affinity is an organisation’s capability to earn trust, sustained preference, repeat engagement, and loyalty. Desire may begin the relationship, but affinity is built through what happens next: whether the organisation delivers consistently, whether the experience matches the promise, and whether repeated interactions deepen rather than weaken trust. Trust transforms initial interest into enduring commitment.
Only then does monetisation become sustainable. Monetisation answers the question of how an organisation captures value from the relationships it has built. Revenue alone is not sufficient evidence of successful monetisation under DAM. An organisation can generate significant revenue and, at the same time, erode the trust, preference, or engagement that made the revenue possible. Enduring monetisation is different. It converts trust, preference, and engagement into economic value without weakening the relationship on which future value depends. That is what separates capturing value from simply extracting it: the first preserves the conditions for future growth; the second can undermine them.
The sequence also helps explain why growth can become fragile. Monetisation without sufficient desire can produce transactions, but the organisation may find itself continually paying to recreate demand. Desire without affinity can generate attention without lasting preference: people arrive, but they do not stay. And when organisations take the relationship for granted, the trust that made monetisation possible can begin to erode. The three capabilities reinforce one another, but they are not interchangeable. Sequence matters.
For leaders thinking about growth strategy, the practical implication is a different starting point. Instead of beginning with “How do we monetise this opportunity?”, DAM asks: Have we given people a reason to care? Have we given them a reason to stay? And have we earned enough trust to capture value without weakening the relationship? Pricing, distribution, customer acquisition, and conversion still matter. But DAM argues that these are downstream decisions. Enduring commercial advantage begins earlier.
That leaves leaders with a harder question: how do they know when enough desire or affinity has actually been built? Time alone cannot answer it. A new brand entering a market from scratch does not begin from the same position as an established organisation launching a new product or entering a new geography. What matters is the starting position and the evidence that each capability is actually taking hold.
For Desire, that means examining relevance, authenticity, credibility, and aspiration. For Affinity, the signals shift to trust, sustained preference, repeat engagement, and loyalty. Are people returning voluntarily? Do they continue to choose the organisation when alternatives exist? Does the relationship remain resilient when competitors emerge or circumstances change? These are more useful indicators of readiness than elapsed time alone.
Elapsed time is therefore the wrong measure. What matters is the distance travelled from the organisation’s starting position, where the gaps remain, and whether Desire and Affinity are strong enough to support what comes next.
This is why the DAM Framework extends far beyond branding or marketing. The same questions arise when building a personal brand, launching a product, pursuing international expansion, scaling a business, strengthening an institution, or even shaping a nation’s global reputation. In each case, the sequence begins with relevance and relationship before moving to value capture.
The organisations that endure understand that monetisation is not the beginning of the relationship. It is the reward for building one. Organisations do not monetise because customers exist. They monetise because they have earned the right to do so.
Gbemisola Abudu is the founder and managing principal of BMGA Advisory, where she advises corporations, investors, founders, and governments on market entry, expansion strategy, localisation, and long-term value creation across Africa and global markets. Her work sits at the intersection of strategy, culture, capital, and institutional development, with a focus on how organisations build relevance, strengthen relationships with the markets and communities they serve, and translate opportunity into enduring value.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
Follow the story
