Africa’s fintech industry is entering a more difficult phase of growth as rising cloud costs, cybersecurity requirements and tightening regulation begin to put pressure on the margins of companies that once benefited from the relatively low cost and flexibility of cloud infrastructure.
A recent poll of 400 fintech leaders by Africa Hyperscalers found that cloud cost was the biggest infrastructure challenge confronting fintechs as they scale, accounting for 60 percent of responses. Cybersecurity followed at 18 percent, regulation at 13 percent, local hosting at five percent and service reliability at four percent.
While the poll should be viewed as an industry signal rather than a representative survey, the scale of the response highlights a growing concern, in that, infrastructure is moving from a technology issue to a fundamental question of fintech profitability.
For years, cloud computing allowed African fintechs to avoid the heavy upfront investment associated with traditional data centres. Payment companies, digital lenders, remittance platforms and neobanks could deploy applications quickly, add computing capacity as customers increased and enter new markets without building physical infrastructure.
But the economics change as platforms mature. Every additional transaction can trigger a chain of computing activity like customer authentication, database queries, fraud screening, communication with payment switches, balance updates, notifications, data storage and regulatory record-keeping.
Each layer can add to the infrastructure bill. For fintechs operating on relatively thin transaction margins, the problem becomes particularly significant when cloud expenditure rises faster than revenue per customer or transaction.
The challenge is further complicated by foreign-exchange exposure. Many African fintechs generate revenue in local currencies while some infrastructure commitments are priced in dollars. Currency depreciation can therefore increase technology costs even when a company’s underlying transaction volume has not changed significantly.
The result is a new unit-economics problem for the industry, in that, a fintech can grow its customer base and transaction volumes while seeing a smaller share of each transaction converted into operating profit.
Security adds another layer
The second-largest concern identified by the Africa Hyperscalers poll was cybersecurity, at 18 percent.
That ranking carries particular significance because financial technology companies cannot simply cut security expenditure when cloud bills increase.
Fintechs hold identity information, account details, transaction records and other sensitive financial data. Their systems are also interconnected with banks, payment switches, telecommunications companies and third-party technology providers.
Consequently, reducing cloud expenditure by eliminating security monitoring, backups, redundancy or other resilience controls can create risks that far exceed the savings.
The emerging challenge for technology executives is therefore not simply how to make cloud infrastructure cheaper, but how to distinguish between waste and resilience.
Yellow Card, the African stablecoin and payments infrastructure company, illustrates the potential for architectural changes to reduce this pressure. Its CTO, Justin Poiroux, said the company uses serverless infrastructure that automatically responds to demand and has reduced operating costs by between 40 percent and 50 percent, while maintaining reported uptime above 99.9 percent across its expansion into more than 20 markets.
The implication for other fintechs is significant as cloud economics increasingly have to be designed into the architecture rather than addressed after the monthly infrastructure bill arrives.
Read also:Tim Cook’s final day as CEO marks the beginning of Apple’s next big test
Regulation could increase the cost pressure
Regulation, which accounted for 13 percent of responses in the poll, is also becoming an infrastructure issue.
In Nigeria, the Central Bank of Nigeria introduced new payments-system measures in June requiring financial institutions and payment participants to ensure that payment transaction data generated in Nigeria are stored and managed domestically from January 1, 2027.
The directive means that fintechs using international cloud infrastructure must examine where their payment data is stored, processed, backed up and transferred.
That can involve changes to databases, cloud contracts, disaster-recovery arrangements and application architecture.
For companies operating across multiple African markets, the problem is potentially more complicated because data-protection and residency requirements can differ between jurisdictions.
The cost implications are significant because localisation does not necessarily mean simply purchasing space in a Nigerian data centre. A financial platform needs resilient power, connectivity, cybersecurity, redundancy, disaster recovery and the ability to scale during transaction peaks.
‘Six months is widely seen as unrealistic’
Krishnan Ranganath, chief executive officer of UniCloud Africa, told BusinessDay that the industry is still in the early stages of responding to Nigeria’s localisation requirement.
He said many financial institutions are assessing their options and examining infrastructure, data-handling and compliance requirements before committing to migration projects.
According to Ranganath, most Tier 1 and Tier 2 banks have already localised their data, making fintechs and newer financial institutions the segment to watch as the deadline approaches.
He estimated that existing data-centre infrastructure could accommodate between 14MW and 30MW of additional IT load, depending on the level of demand generated by the migration. He also estimated that roughly 20MW of IT capacity is already available across major Nigerian data centres, with another 15MW to 20MW capable of being fitted out within the existing ecosystem.
But capacity is not the only concern. Ranganath said institutions have existing technology contracts and face financial implications when moving workloads. He also identified concerns around infrastructure confidence, cybersecurity, disaster recovery and the compressed compliance window.
His warning goes beyond the cost of migration, even as he disclosed that the biggest risks is that institutions could satisfy the regulatory requirement by establishing a secondary local site without adequately testing whether that site can actually handle a major failure under peak transaction conditions.
A data centre can exist on paper as a disaster-recovery facility without necessarily providing proven resilience in a crisis.
Power and skills create another risk
Nigeria’s power infrastructure presents another variable. Moving workloads from global cloud platforms to locally managed infrastructure could transfer responsibilities that hyperscalers previously handled automatically, including scaling, redundancy, monitoring, security and infrastructure management.
Ranganath warned that institutions could face skills shortages if local teams lack experience operating infrastructure at comparable scale.
There is also a transition-period cybersecurity risk. Migration typically requires institutions to run old and new environments simultaneously, create temporary access for vendors and transfer sensitive information between systems. A compressed migration programme could therefore expose several financial institutions to elevated operational and security risks at the same time.
James Edeh, head of compliance at FairMoney Microfinance Bank, told BusinessDay that the lender is reviewing how it will meet Nigeria’s localisation requirements.
FairMoney currently uses Amazon Web Services and is assessing options for localising its data, including infrastructure provided by Nigerian data-centre operators.
Edeh said the process would involve determining which services and datasets should be migrated first rather than treating localisation as a simple infrastructure exercise. He also pointed to unreliable power and the cost of maintaining highly resilient local data centres as operational considerations.
The bigger question: who pays?
The convergence of these pressures raises a broader question for Africa’s fintech industry.
If cloud costs are already the biggest infrastructure concern, and companies must simultaneously strengthen cybersecurity and comply with increasingly demanding data rules, the cost of operating a fintech platform could rise materially.
That cost cannot always be absorbed by shareholders. It could eventually influence pricing, transaction fees, lending margins and the economics of serving low-value customers.
For investors, the issue also changes how fintech companies should be assessed. Customer acquisition, transaction volumes and valuation may no longer provide enough information about the sustainability of a digital financial business.
Investors will increasingly need to understand cost per transaction, cloud utilisation, infrastructure commitments, foreign-exchange exposure, cybersecurity spending and disaster-recovery costs.
This is why cloud expenditure can no longer sit exclusively within the technology department.
Chief technology officers and chief financial officers need to jointly understand how infrastructure decisions affect margins.
Read also: Africa fintech growth must be matched by resilient infrastructure – Belema CEO
A new infrastructure race
The pressure could nevertheless create opportunities for Africa’s data-centre and cloud industry.
Ranganath said UniCloud Africa is partnering with existing data-centre operators, including Open Access Data Centre, while exploring additional partnerships across Africa and seeking investment to expand.
The opportunity is not simply to replace foreign cloud providers with African infrastructure.
Local providers must demonstrate competitive pricing, reliable power, network diversity, security, disaster recovery, technical expertise and the ability to scale quickly.
For fintechs, the question is increasingly becoming less about whether infrastructure is local or international and more about whether it delivers the right combination of cost, performance, compliance, security and resilience.
Temitope Osunrinde, director at Africa Hyperscalers, told BusinessDay that the next phase of Africa’s digital growth will require fintechs and enterprises to scale across local and global cloud environments without allowing infrastructure costs to erode margins or compromising security and reliability.
That points to a fundamental shift in Africa’s fintech story. The first phase was about growth at speed. The next phase will be about growth with discipline.
With 60 percent of fintech leaders in the Africa Hyperscalers poll identifying cloud cost as their biggest infrastructure challenge, the industry’s infrastructure choices are increasingly becoming financial choices.
For Africa’s fintechs, the question is no longer simply how many customers they can acquire or how many transactions they can process. It is how much of every transaction remains after the cloud, cybersecurity, compliance and resilience bills have been paid.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
Follow the story
