I Would Still Post That Video – Sarkodie Breaks Silence On Stonebwoy Disability Controversy

According to a report by Ghbase News on Monday October 19, 2026, Ghanaian rapper Michael Owusu Addo, popularly known as Sarkodie, has defended his decision to share a video featuring a one-legged person, insisting that he had no intention of mocking dancehall musician Stonebwoy or making fun of anyone living with a physical disability.

The award-winning musician made the clarification during an interview with media personality Serwaa Amihere, who questioned him about the controversy surrounding the video and whether he had considered how the post might affect Stonebwoy, who has a disability affecting one of his legs.

During the conversation, Serwaa Amihere asked Sarkodie why he chose to share the video despite the possibility that it could be interpreted as a reference to Stonebwoy.

Her question focused on the sensitivity surrounding disability and the potential for such content to be perceived as offensive, particularly given the history of public discussions involving the two musicians.

In response, Sarkodie maintained that Stonebwoy was not on his mind when he shared the video.

He strongly rejected suggestions that he would deliberately target another person because of their physical condition, arguing that such behaviour was inconsistent with his principles and conduct throughout his music career.

According to the rapper, there are certain personal issues he would never use to attack another individual, even when disagreements arise within the entertainment industry.

He explained that although he might engage in lyrical exchanges with another musician during a rap beef, he draws a clear line between musical competition and making fun of someone’s physical condition.

“The last thing I would ever think of doing is mocking another human being. Throughout my career, I have never done that, and this will not be the first time. There are certain things that are below the belt that you will never find Sarkodie doing. If it is a rap beef, that is different,” he said.

Sarkodie further emphasised that disability should not be treated as a subject for ridicule, warning that people should be mindful of the sensitive nature of such matters.

“This is something serious. You don’t joke about it because you don’t know what can happen to you or your kids,” he stated.

His comments appeared aimed at distinguishing between content he shares for entertainment and any deliberate attempt to embarrass or insult someone over a personal circumstance.

He insisted that the video was not directed at Stonebwoy and that he should not be judged as though he had intentionally set out to hurt the dancehall musician.

The rapper also addressed the question of whether someone should be expected to feel guilty when another person takes offence at an action that was not intended to target them.

He argued that the absence of malicious intent was an important part of understanding the controversy.

“If you choose to be offended when I did not intend to offend you, thinking I should feel bad about it is not right,” Sarkodie explained.

However, the discussion took a more direct turn when Serwaa Amihere asked whether he would share the video again if he could go back and make the decision afresh, especially considering the criticism that followed its publication.

Sarkodie answered without hesitation, maintaining that he would make the same decision because, according to him, the post was never intended as a jab at Stonebwoy.

“If I had the opportunity, I would still post that video. If I was not thinking about you, why should I feel bad? If you choose to be offended and I did not try to offend you, and you think because of that I have to feel sad, no, that’s not right for any human being,” he said.

He added that he would not want anyone to be unfairly blamed for something they had no intention of doing, even if the circumstances were reversed.

For Sarkodie, the issue should be considered in light of the intention behind the post rather than solely through the interpretation placed on it by others.

“I wouldn’t want that for any human being, even if the tables are turned. I don’t think it’s fair to push what you feel towards somebody else when the person has nothing to do with it,” he stated.

Sarkodie’s remarks have brought renewed attention to the discussion about humour, disability and the responsibility public figures carry when sharing content on social media.

While the rapper insists that his post had no connection to Stonebwoy, the controversy highlights how online content can attract interpretations that differ from what the person who shared it intended.

The debate also raises questions about the distinction between intention and impact.

A person may share content without intending to insult anyone, yet others may interpret it differently because of its context or its perceived connection to a particular individual.

Sarkodie’s defence centres on his claim that he had no intention of targeting Stonebwoy and therefore sees no reason to regret the post.

For supporters who agree with his explanation, the rapper’s willingness to stand by his position may be viewed as an indication that he does not want assumptions about his intentions to determine how his actions are judged.

Others may continue to focus on how public figures can exercise greater sensitivity when sharing content that touches on disability.

The controversy has therefore moved beyond the video itself to a broader conversation about personal responsibility, public perception and the limits of humour when sensitive issues are involved.

Ultimately, Sarkodie has made his position clear: he says he was not thinking about Stonebwoy when he shared the video, rejects the suggestion that he intended to mock a person with a disability, and insists that he would post it again under the same circumstances.

As the discussion continues, his comments are likely to keep the focus on whether the intention behind a social media post should carry more weight than the offence some viewers believe it may cause.

Blessed_Hub [email protected]