Tesla Launches Cybercab Robotaxi, Attracts Federal Probe Over Its Driverless Design

Tesla has officially put its long-awaited Cybercab robotaxi into service, nearly two years after unveiling the vehicle, but the commercial debut has been quickly overshadowed by a federal safety investigation into the car’s unconventional driverless design.

The electric-vehicle maker said on its website that customers can now request autonomous rides through its Robotaxi app on iOS and Android. The service is available across Austin, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando and Tampa, although the purpose-built Cybercab initially appears to be operating only in Austin.

Even in Austin, riders cannot specifically select a Cybercab. The vehicle is assigned based on passenger numbers and availability, meaning Tesla’s initial deployment remains tightly controlled rather than representing a full-scale launch of its dedicated robotaxi fleet.

***Register *for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.

**Register **for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.

Register* for Nigeria Capital Market Masterclass.*

“Hail your car and use it for errands, commuting and more,” Tesla said on its website.

The launch marks a significant step in Elon Musk’s long-running effort to turn Tesla from an automaker into an autonomous transportation company. But the following safety probes indicate that the company’s ability to scale the service will depend not only on its autonomous-driving technology but also on regulatory approval, vehicle certification, safety performance and its ability to demonstrate that a car designed without conventional driver controls can meet federal safety requirements.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an audit query covering about 1,000 Cybercabs following Tesla’s start of commercial service.

According to NHTSA, Tesla began operating a small number of Cybercabs commercially on Thursday after self-certifying that the vehicles comply with applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Tesla has indicated that it intends to expand the number of vehicles and operate the robotaxis in additional locations.

“The vehicles lack permanently attached, conventional manual controls, such as a brake pedal, gas pedal, steering wheel and mirrors,” NHTSA said in its notice.

The agency said it is examining the process and technical information Tesla used to certify the vehicle, including whether the company determined that certain federal safety standards did not apply to the Cybercab because of its unusual design.

The investigation does not by itself establish that the Cybercab violates federal safety standards. Rather, it highlights the regulatory challenge created by Tesla’s decision to develop a vehicle specifically for autonomous operation instead of adapting a conventional passenger car with a steering wheel and pedals.

Tesla has registered hundreds of autonomous vehicles in Texas. Reuters reported that the company has registered 420 autonomous vehicles in the state, including 45 Cybercabs. It remains unclear how many of those Cybercabs are carrying paying passengers and how many are being used for testing and development.

Tesla is also operating robotaxi services in Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando and Tampa using Model Y vehicles, giving the company a broader operational footprint while its purpose-built Cybercab remains in a much smaller-scale deployment.

Unlike the Model Y, the Cybercab has no steering wheel or conventional brake pedal. The vehicle has been designed around the premise that there will be no human driver controlling it. Inside, it features bench-style seating for two passengers and a large central touchscreen. The vehicle also provides cargo space for luggage, scooters, and other large items.

Tesla currently owns the Cybercabs operating in Austin, but Musk has previously described a much larger business model in which customers could eventually purchase multiple Cybercabs and place them into Tesla’s autonomous ride-hailing network.

The vehicles are not yet available for individual purchase. Tesla is, however, accepting inquiries from companies interested in helping it “build its robotaxi network,” suggesting that its first sales could be directed toward fleet operators rather than individual consumers.

That model is central to Tesla’s broader autonomous-vehicle strategy. Instead of relying solely on vehicle sales, the company wants to create a transportation network in which autonomous vehicles generate recurring revenue through passenger trips. If Tesla can eventually operate such a network at scale, the economics could be materially different from those of conventional vehicle manufacturing.

For now, however, the Cybercab’s limited availability underscores the gap between that long-term vision and the current state of the business.

No Room for Kids, and When There’s a Crash

Safety requirements are particularly visible in Tesla’s rules for passengers. Children younger than 13 are not currently permitted to ride in the Cybercab, while minors between the ages of 8 and 17 can ride in Tesla’s Robotaxi Model Y vehicles. Tesla requires passengers under 18 to be accompanied by an adult.

The Cybercab also does not have the standard LATCH anchors commonly used to secure child seats. Tesla says child seats can instead be secured with the vehicle’s seat belts.

The company has also provided detailed procedures for what happens if a Cybercab is involved in a crash.

If a collision occurs, the vehicle is designed to deploy its airbags, unlock the doors, activate hazard and interior lights, disable its high-voltage battery, move its windows into a vent position, apply the brakes, and stop and park. Its infotainment system will then establish a two-way connection with Tesla’s rider-support team.

The automatic unlocking of the doors is notable given Tesla’s continuing scrutiny over electronic door latches.

Tesla has faced criticism in the United States and China over electronic door-opening systems and concerns that they could complicate escape following a crash. The company agreed last month to recall 3 million vehicles in China as part of a broader investigation involving electronic door latches that could potentially trap occupants after collisions.

The Cybercab nevertheless includes a physical interior release that is more readily accessible than those found in some other Tesla vehicles. Its doors primarily use electronic latches and can open automatically at the beginning or end of a trip, while an exterior button can also be used to open them.

Inside the vehicle, the manual emergency release is positioned on the armrest of each door, giving occupants a mechanical means of opening the doors if the electronic system becomes unavailable.

Tesla has also adopted a brake-by-wire system in the Cybercab. Rather than relying on a conventional hydraulic system that uses brake fluid and physical lines to transmit pressure, electronic actuators control the brake calipers.

“Having electric brakes avoids the complexity of a hydraulic system: no need to rout [sic] plumbing all around the car,” Musk wrote in a post.

The approach is consistent with Tesla’s broader push toward reducing mechanical components in its vehicles. The company previously introduced steer-by-wire technology in the Cybertruck, eliminating the traditional physical connection between the steering wheel and front wheels.

The Cybercab also has some less consequential but unusual design limitations. Its windows cannot currently be fully opened, according to Tesla’s documentation, although the company has not explained why.

The vehicle includes USB-C charging ports capable of delivering up to 90 watts, according to influencer Jeremy Judkins. That would provide considerably more power than the USB charging outlets typically found in passenger vehicles.

The more important question for Tesla, however, is whether its technology and vehicle architecture can move beyond a limited commercial demonstration.

The Cybercab launch represents a test of several Tesla claims at once: that its autonomous-driving technology can safely operate without a human driver, that a purpose-built vehicle without conventional controls can satisfy regulators, and that autonomous ride-hailing can ultimately become a scalable and profitable business.

The NHTSA investigation puts particular focus on the second question. Tesla has effectively asked regulators to accept a fundamentally different vehicle architecture in which components traditionally required for human driving are removed because the vehicle is intended to operate autonomously. That could eventually lower manufacturing costs and simplify the vehicle, but it also increases the regulatory burden because failures in autonomous systems cannot simply be mitigated by handing control back to a human driver.

However, a successful deployment could provide Tesla with a foundation for a global autonomous ride-hailing network and a new source of recurring revenue. But a regulatory setback, safety incident or prolonged inability to scale the fleet, by contrast, would expose the distance between Tesla’s autonomous-driving ambitions and the practical requirements of deploying driverless vehicles on public roads.

The Cybercab is finally carrying passengers, but its first real test may be whether Tesla can convince regulators and the public that a vehicle without a steering wheel or brake pedal is ready to become a mainstream form of transportation.