Durban North ratepayers unpack why they oppose Beachwood development

An artist’s impression of the Beachwood Coastal Estate along the coast in Durban North.

Image: Supplied

The longstanding battle between the developer of the multi-billion-rand Beachwood estate and local residents shows no signs of abating, with ratepayers pushing back against the project and describing it as a “slow eviction notice” for the less wealthy.

The ratepayers have stated that while the Beachwood development near Virginia Airport will have its benefits, it will also bring severe negatives that will inflict pain on the current residents living in the area, including making housing unaffordable. The Mercury reported on Friday that the R3.5 billion development was set to get off the ground in August of this year. The eThekwini Municipality has stated that the compliance process required for the project to commence has been complied with.

The ratepayers are challenging the development in court, and the judgment is expected in the coming weeks. A ratepayer, Dennis Theron, detailed in a letter a long list of alleged shortcomings leading to the project being finalised, as well as the negative impact it will have on the community currently residing in the area.

In a letter, Theron stated, “Let’s be clear: the development will no doubt be a glittering luxury estate, a world-class money-spinner, and a triumph for the developer and the City’s revenue machine. Congratulations to them. They will do very well out of it.

“But the public has paid the price. The open green space that residents once enjoyed as a title-deed right has been erased forever—just like countless other public green spaces the City has quietly consumed. Green spaces don’t make money, so they are sacrificed. Simple as that.

“Property values will rise, and with them, the already suffocating municipal rates. Middle-income families will be pushed out as the ultra-wealthy move in. Durban North will follow the same trajectory as Cape Town: a playground for the rich, and a slow eviction notice for everyone else.“

He said the community is not happy with the project and has indicated their objection to it clearly.

“Nearly 3 000 objections and a petition of similar size were submitted. All ignored. The City treats objections that residents spend hours composing, because they want to ensure their concerns are presented professionally, clearly, unambiguously, and in detail, as nothing more than a meaningless tick-the-box exercise and issues pre-decided approvals while pretending the public was heard.

“Appeals are a waste of time because the City never addresses a single concern in the objections, which makes appeals an expensive waste of time. The Municipal Planning Tribunal, which by law must be largely independent and impartial, is instead dominated by political office-bearers. Decisions affecting thousands of residents are being made by people whose loyalty is to party structures, not the public who fund their obscene and undeserved salaries.

“Yes, the development will increase security and reduce vagrancy. But vagrants mainly become vagrants as a direct result of long-term ANC governance failures that have produced staggering poverty and unemployment.“

He added that while the City pours its energy into “catalytic projects” for the wealthy, the landless remain landless. Theron said the City has rolled out the red carpet for the developer, even inventing a new zoning category to ensure the project proceeds smoothly.

“But here is one practical suggestion: advise your buyers—those paying R8 million and more for homes in this R1.2 billion estate—to reserve a garage for a boat. When the floodwaters come, as they inevitably will, nature will reclaim the floodplains that once protected the ecosystem.

“When water meets earthworks and concrete instead of wetlands, it will find new paths. If it cannot, your “catalytic project” may become a prime venue for regattas, and insurers may adjust their premiums accordingly,” he concluded.

A resident, Vanessa Knight, said supporters of the project point to jobs, investment, and increased property values. She acknowledged that these are legitimate considerations but said once a coastal ecosystem is destroyed, it cannot simply be replaced.

“This is not opposition to development for the sake of opposition. Most residents understand that cities must grow and evolve. The question is whether growth should come at the expense of irreplaceable natural assets,” she said.

She further emphasised, “The true cost of this development will not be measured by the price of the homes eventually built there. It will be measured by the loss of biodiversity, the displacement of wildlife, the destruction of mature indigenous vegetation, and the gradual disappearance of the natural spaces that make Durban North such a special place to live.”

For more stories from The Mercury, click the link THE MERCURY