Top 5 people with most debts in the world

Who are the people with the most debt in the world? The answer is less straightforward than it appears. A person may personally owe money, guarantee a company’s borrowing, or be responsible for liabilities arising from a business they control. Those are not necessarily the same thing.

This list therefore looks at five people whose financial stories involve exceptionally large, documented debts or debt-related obligations. It also shows why debt should not be mistaken for wealth.

Nothing here is an encouragement to borrow. For most people, debt used to finance consumption or uncertain investments can turn a financial problem into a much bigger one.

Mike Tyson filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2003 after years of extravagant spending. His bankruptcy petition listed about $27 million in bills, including $13.3 million owed to the IRS, alongside debts to a limousine company, jeweller, Ferrari dealership and other creditors.

By July 2004, US Bankruptcy Court records put his debt at about $38 million, owed to at least 246 creditors.

Imagine someone earning N12 million monthly who commits to a N30 million car, expensive accommodation, frequent travel and other recurring luxuries. The salary may be enough to obtain these things, but if most of the income is already committed before the next payday, the apparent wealth is largely an illusion.

A large salary should therefore not be measured only by its zeros or by what it can buy. Its real value lies in how much can be retained and converted into lasting financial value without creating obligations that continually consume future income.

Brazilian businessman Eike Batista once had a fortune estimated at more than $30 billion, making him one of the world’s richest people. His EBX empire expanded rapidly across oil, mining, logistics and energy, with expansion heavily dependent on expectations of future growth.

When his companies began failing to meet those expectations, the financial structure supporting them unravelled.

By 2013, the Financial Times reported that Batista’s liabilities stood at about $3.5 billion, only around $200 million below the value of his remaining assets.

Consider a Nigerian business worth N500 million that borrows another N500 million to expand. The business may now control N1 billion worth of operations, but the owner has not suddenly become N1 billion richer. Half of that money belongs to lenders until it is repaid.

If the expansion succeeds, the borrowing may help create additional value. If it fails, the debt does not disappear with the business opportunity. Debt can therefore magnify success. It can magnify failure just as efficiently.

Nigeria also has a major example of what happens when a business owner’s personal guarantee becomes enforceable.

Dr A.B.C. Orjiako, former chairman of Seplat Energy and a founder of Shebah Exploration & Production Company, became involved in litigation over a syndicated loan made to SEPCOL.

A British Virgin Islands court later gave effect to a judgment involving more than $220 million owed to Access Bank, arising from obligations under a personal guarantee.

Indian media entrepreneur Subhash Chandra illustrates another complication. In his personal insolvency proceedings, creditors have presented admitted claims of about ₹22,006.57 crore arising from personal guarantees connected to companies associated with his Essel Group.

An earlier NCLT-approved plan proposed that he pay just ₹6.25 crore against those claims, but the approval has since been put on hold for rehearing after disagreement within the tribunal.

The ₹22,006 crore figure should not be interpreted as meaning Chandra personally collected that amount as a bank loan. It represents claims arising from guarantees.

That distinction is important for anyone reading headlines about billionaires and debt. A company’s borrowing, a personal guarantee and an individual’s direct loan are different financial obligations.

For example, a businessman may guarantee a N1 billion facility taken by a company without personally receiving N1 billion in cash. But if the company defaults and the guarantee is enforced, the guarantor may still face a substantial personal obligation. The headline number matters. So does understanding what it actually represents.

Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, provides the most controversial case on this list because he has publicly said he is about $1.2 billion in debt. That figure, however, requires substantial context.

Recent reporting says the debt is associated largely with real-estate investments held with partners, including a portfolio of roughly 1,500 apartments. His former wife and business partner, Kim Kiyosaki, has said his personal liability is much smaller than the headline figure.

Kiyosaki deliberately argues that borrowing can be used to acquire income-producing assets. In principle, that is different from borrowing to buy depreciating consumer goods. But this is precisely where the article should not be misunderstood.

These five cases reveal five different dangers.

Tyson shows how a large income can disappear beneath an expensive lifestyle. Batista demonstrates how borrowing can magnify the consequences of a failed business expansion.

Orjiako’s case shows how personal guarantees can bring corporate borrowing into an individual’s financial affairs. Chandra demonstrates why enormous debt figures need to be examined before being labelled personal debt.

Kiyosaki shows that wealthy investors may deliberately use borrowing, but that does not make debt safe or desirable for everyone.

A person earning N12 million monthly is not automatically financially stronger than someone earning N2 million. If the first person spends almost everything while the second consistently saves and builds assets, the smaller income may ultimately produce greater financial security.

The real measure of earning power is therefore not simply how many zeros appear on an income or how much it can buy. It is how much lasting value can be built from that income without continually borrowing against the future.

Debt can finance productive businesses. It can also destroy fortunes.

For ordinary financial life, the safer lesson from these extraordinary cases is not how to become better at borrowing. It is how to become financially strong enough that borrowing is never mistaken for wealth.

The findings raise concerns about the widespread exposure people may face through consumer products and…

The Federal Government is contributing 30 per cent of the funding for the Lagos-Calabar Coastal…

According to the Executive Secretary, students from Sokoto State performed commendably across all the subjects…

Nasrul-Lahi-li Fathi Society of Nigeria (NASFAT), the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), and Fountain…

Obaro of Kabba and Chairman of the Okun Area Traditional Council, HRM Oba Solomon Dele…

About 80 per cent of the projects currently being executed by his ministry were inherited…