Adu-Boahene’s Lawyer Seeks to Strike Out Prosecution Submissions in GH¢49.1m Cybersecurity Case

Counsel for Adu-Boahene has filed a motion asking the High Court to strike out portions of the prosecution’s submissions in the GH¢49.1 million cybersecurity software theft case, arguing that they are not borne out by the court record. The application, reported by TV3GH, targets specific parts of the prosecution’s written submissions which the defence says go beyond what is supported by evidence on record.

The motion is the latest development in the high-profile case, which centres on allegations involving the theft of cybersecurity software valued at GH¢49.1 million. The defence’s move signals a continued effort to challenge the prosecution’s case on procedural and evidentiary grounds.

By seeking to strike out the contested portions, counsel for Adu-Boahene is essentially asking the court to disregard arguments or assertions that, in the defence’s view, lack foundation in the record of proceedings. Such applications are typically aimed at ensuring that the court’s assessment is based strictly on properly admitted evidence and submissions.

The prosecution is expected to respond to the motion, after which the court will determine whether to grant the request. The outcome could shape the scope of the arguments the court will consider as the case progresses.

The case has attracted significant public interest given the sums involved and its implications for the cybersecurity sector. The court’s ruling on the motion will be closely watched by both parties and observers of the proceedings.