This article was originally published on Malawi24 ">Malawi24, Malawi's #1 independent news platform. The modern wellbeing movement can sometimes seem like an endless parade of new remedies: mindfulness, nature retreats, digital detoxes, community activities, purpose-driven living and countless ways to become healthier, calmer and more fulfilled. But beneath these trends is a fascinating question: why are we so desperate to find ways of feeling better in the first […] Read the full article and mo
The modern wellbeing movement can sometimes seem like an endless parade of new remedies: mindfulness, nature retreats, digital detoxes, community activities, purpose-driven living and countless ways to become healthier, calmer and more fulfilled.
But beneath these trends is a fascinating question: why are we so desperate to find ways of feeling better in the first place?
The growing emphasis on wellbeing reflects a genuine problem. Despite extraordinary advances in technology, medicine and material prosperity, human beings continue to struggle with anxiety, insecurity, loneliness, conflict, dissatisfaction and a persistent sense that something is not quite right.
Australian biologist Jeremy Griffith offers an unusual explanation for this predicament. His instinct versus intellect theory proposes that the human condition – our capacity for insecurity, anger, egocentricity, alienation and psychological distress – arose from a conflict between our inherited instincts and our emerging conscious intellect. According to Griffith, the intellect had to question, experiment and seek understanding, while our instinctive system operated through established, automatic orientations. The resulting conflict left the conscious mind feeling insecure and defensive.
Through this perspective, some of today’s most popular wellbeing trends take on a different significance. They can be interpreted not merely as lifestyle choices, but as intuitive attempts to counteract different expressions of the human condition.
Here are five examples.
1. The return to nature — an antidote to excessive self-focus
One of the most noticeable developments in contemporary wellbeing is the renewed fascination with nature.
Forest bathing, gardening, hiking, outdoor retreats, nature therapy and simply spending time away from screens have all become increasingly popular. Even the broader wellness industry is incorporating nature, mindfulness and movement into its offerings.
Why does getting outside seem to make us feel better?
Griffith’s explanation provides an intriguing possibility.
If the human intellect has become caught up in an internal struggle that produces insecurity and defensiveness, then modern life can easily amplify that problem. We spend enormous amounts of time thinking about ourselves: How successful am I? How do I compare with other people? What do they think of me? Am I attractive enough, wealthy enough, productive enough or important enough?
Nature interrupts that constant self-referencing.
A walk through a forest does not ask us to compete. A garden does not care about our status. The natural world draws attention outward, offering an experience of participation rather than self-evaluation.
The popularity of nature-based wellbeing may therefore be revealing a deep human need to escape the psychological pressure of an excessively self-conscious existence.
2. Mindfulness — an antidote to psychological reactivity
Few wellbeing trends have grown as rapidly as mindfulness.
At its simplest, mindfulness involves paying attention to present experience rather than becoming completely absorbed in thoughts, emotions and habitual reactions. Its appeal is easy to understand in an age of constant stimulation, comparison and anxiety.
But Griffith’s explanation suggests an even more interesting interpretation.
If defensive behaviour is partly the product of deep-seated insecurity, then our immediate reactions – anger, defensiveness, resentment, jealousy or anxiety – may not necessarily represent who we fundamentally are.
Mindfulness creates a small but important space between experiencing a reaction and acting upon it.
Instead of immediately responding to criticism, we can observe our defensiveness. Instead of automatically believing an anxious thought, we can notice it, perhaps dispel it. Instead of allowing anger to dictate our behaviour, we can recognise what is happening within us.
In this sense, the mindfulness movement can be seen as an intuitive attempt to gain freedom from the automatic reactions that make human relationships and inner life so difficult.
It doesn’t necessarily explain why those reactions exist. Griffith’s theory attempts to provide that deeper explanation.
3. The rediscovery of human connection — an antidote to alienation
Another major wellbeing trend is the growing recognition that human beings need genuine connection.
Community groups, shared experiences, volunteering, group exercise, face-to-face social activities and renewed interest in meaningful relationships all reflect a reaction against the isolation that can accompany modern life.
This is particularly revealing in an era in which we can communicate with almost anyone instantly while still feeling profoundly lonely.
Griffith identifies alienation as one of the major expressions of the human condition. In his account, the insecurity generated by the instinct-intellect conflict contributed to increasingly defensive and competitive behaviour.
That provides a striking way of understanding our contemporary hunger for belonging.
Perhaps people are not simply looking for more social activity. Perhaps we are searching for relationships in which we do not have to continually prove ourselves.
The appeal of authentic community is partly that it can temporarily suspend the competitive question of How am I doing compared with everyone else?
We can simply belong.
That makes the rise of community-oriented wellbeing particularly interesting from a Griffithian perspective: it can be understood as a movement away from isolation and defensive self-interest and back towards genuine cooperation.
Those interested in exploring this perspective further can find an active Fix The World community discussing Griffith’s ideas and their implications.
4. Purpose and meaning — an antidote to the endless pursuit of status
Wellbeing is also moving beyond the idea that happiness comes from comfort and consumption.
There is increasing interest in purpose, meaningful work, contribution, volunteering and living according to values. Even contemporary longevity and wellbeing discussions increasingly emphasise relationships, purpose, movement and emotional wellbeing rather than simply extending lifespan.
Again, Griffith’s theory offers a provocative interpretation.
He argues that the insecurity arising from the human condition led people to seek reassurance through achievements and external validation – what his framework describes in terms of the pursuit of power, fame, fortune and glory.
If that analysis is correct, then the growing desire for meaningful rather than merely successful lives could represent an important cultural shift.
People are beginning to ask questions such as:
What am I contributing?
Who am I helping?
What makes my life worthwhile?
These questions are fundamentally different from How impressive am I?
They shift attention from proving personal worth to making a contribution.
That distinction is central to Griffith’s vision of what could happen if human beings no longer needed to compensate for deep psychological insecurity.
5. The search for an explanation — an antidote to confusion
Perhaps the most significant wellbeing trend is not a particular therapy or lifestyle practice at all.
It is the growing desire to understand ourselves.
People increasingly want explanations for anxiety, trauma, loneliness, conflict, relationship breakdown, anger and other forms of psychological distress. We are no longer satisfied simply with being told to manage symptoms. We want to know why the human mind behaves as it does.
This is where Griffith’s work takes the argument to its most fundamental level.
His proposition is that humanity’s psychological distress is not simply a collection of unrelated problems. Instead, he argues that these behaviours are interconnected expressions of an underlying human condition produced by the conflict between instinct and intellect.
Whether one ultimately accepts that theory or not, its significance lies in the ambition of the question it asks.
Rather than asking merely:
How can I become less anxious?
it asks:
Why did human beings become psychologically anxious in the first place?
Rather than:
How can I stop being defensive?
it asks:
Why did defensiveness become such a fundamental feature of human behaviour?
And rather than:
Why can’t humanity simply learn to cooperate?
it asks:
What happened to make a naturally social species so conflict-ridden?
What if wellbeing is pointing towards something bigger?
Seen individually, these five trends can look like unrelated developments. But viewed together, they form a surprisingly coherent picture.
Nature draws us away from excessive self-focus.
Mindfulness helps us become less reactive.
Connection counters alienation.
Purpose moves us beyond the endless pursuit of external validation.
And the search for understanding takes us beneath the symptoms to the question of why we suffer at all.
This does not mean that every wellness trend is attempting to solve the human condition. Nor does it mean Griffith’s explanation should simply be accepted without critical examination. His theory is a substantial claim about human evolution and psychology, and deserves to be considered on its evidence and explanatory power.
But it does offer a provocative way of interpreting the wellbeing revolution.
Perhaps humanity’s growing fascination with wellbeing is not simply an attempt to become happier.
Perhaps it reflects an intuitive recognition that something deeper needs to change.
We are increasingly looking for ways to become calmer, more connected, less reactive, more purposeful and more at peace with ourselves.
Griffith’s contribution is to ask whether all five impulses might ultimately point towards the same underlying problem – the psychological insecurity he argues has been built into the human condition ever since consciousness emerged.
And if his explanation is correct, the ultimate wellbeing trend would not be another app, retreat or therapeutic technique.
It would be understanding ourselves well enough to no longer need the psychological defences that have caused so much suffering in the first place.
That is a much bigger proposition than wellness.
It is a proposition about human transformation.
For readers wanting to investigate the person behind this theory, this introduction to biologist Jeremy Griffith provides an accessible starting point.
And for those interested in examining the evidence and debate surrounding Griffith’s work, this collection highlights the acclaim for biologist Jeremy Griffith and his explanation of the human condition.
Follow the story