SAFA heads towards a 12 September elective congress with two eligible presidential candidates, unanswered governance questions and no settled Bafana coaching announcement.
South African football is heading into a consequential fortnight: SAFA’s presidency is now a two-way contest, its elective congress is set for 12 September, and the men’s national team still sits at the centre of an unsettled coaching debate.
EWN reported that SAFA’s independent Governance Committee had found two presidential nominees eligible after completing its vetting process. The broadcaster later identified the political contest as one between incumbent Danny Jordaan and AmaZulu president Sandile Zungu, while noting calls from inside football for the election to be postponed.
The vote would be significant in ordinary circumstances. It is more so now because the association has just emerged from a difficult appearance before Parliament and because Bafana Bafana’s next technical plan has not been publicly settled.
The Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture said SAFA faced questions about coaches’ salaries and accountability at its 25 August meeting. According to Parliament’s official account, SAFA chief executive Lydia Monyepao was asked to leave after refusing to disclose salary-package information requested by members.
The committee also objected to the absence of SAFA president Danny Jordaan. Parliament said members wanted clarity on the remuneration of former Bafana coach Hugo Broos and negotiations involving Pitso Mosimane.
Those proceedings do not decide the presidential election, but they frame it. Delegates are not voting only on personalities; they are choosing who will answer for financial decisions, the national team’s direction, development structures and the association’s relationship with Parliament, government and the public.
The confirmed election date is 12 September. EWN reported that two nominations passed the Governance Committee’s eligibility process. It also reported that Bennett Bailey, a SAFA vice-president, had called for postponement.
The association’s statutes set rules for nominations and an elective congress, but any demand to delay the vote would need a proper legal or constitutional basis. Public pressure alone does not automatically stop a congress, and speculation about intervention by FIFA or SASCOC should not be presented as a formal step unless the relevant body confirms it.
The leadership contest coincides with uncertainty over Bafana’s coach ahead of the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations qualifying campaign. Parliament’s account said Mosimane’s appointment remained the subject of negotiation despite his acceptance of the job, while EWN reported there had been no final agreement.
That creates two clocks for SAFA. One counts down to the elective congress. The other counts down to competitive football, where camps, player selection and tactical preparation cannot be improvised at the last moment.
Supporters should expect clear answers before 12 September: who the eligible candidates are, whether the congress will proceed, what governance safeguards apply, and when the national-team coaching arrangement will be finalised.
The association has often asked the public to trust processes taking place behind closed doors. This election will test whether it can replace that reflex with timely, documented accountability.
EWN, “SAFA presidential race confirmed as two-horse contest”
, 28 August 2026.
EWN, “SAFA gears up for upcoming leadership elections”
, 29 August 2026.
Parliament, “SAFA Faces Sports Committee Scrutiny Over Coaches’ Salaries and Accountability”
, 25 August 2026.
SAFA Statutes
, rules governing nominations and the elective congress.
Follow the story
