For an agency that sits at the intersection of trade, taxation and national security, the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) has rarely had a simple mandate.
It is expected to collect revenue for the government, facilitate legitimate trade, protect domestic industries and prevent the movement of prohibited goods across Nigeria’s borders. Increasingly, it is also being asked to do all of this while reducing human interference and making the clearance of legitimate cargo faster.
The demands have become more pronounced under the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose Renewed Hope Agenda places revenue mobilisation, economic growth, job creation and national security among its priorities.
Three years into the administration, Customs is positioning its ongoing reforms around these competing demands, with technology emerging as the connecting thread.
Under Comptroller-General, Adewale Adeniyi, the Service has pursued reforms spanning revenue collection, trade facilitation, automation and border security. The results, however, are best understood not simply through revenue figures but through how the agency is attempting to change the way Nigeria manages its borders and international trade.
Revenue pressure
The most visible measure of Customs’ performance remains revenue. The Service generated N4.03 trillion in the first half of 2026, putting it ahead of its mid-year projection and leaving it with a N11 trillion target for the full year.
The figure continues a sharp increase in collections over the past three years: N3.21 trillion in 2023, N6.105 trillion in 2024 and N7.27 trillion in 2025.
The increase has coincided with a broader push to automate customs processes and improve the assessment and collection of duties.
One of the major components is B’Odogwu, the indigenous trade management platform introduced as part of the Service’s digital transformation programme.
The system is designed to reduce manual intervention in customs processes, improve transaction visibility and allow more functions to be handled electronically.
For Customs, the attraction is not merely technological. The less dependent a clearance process is on individual officers, the fewer opportunities there are for discretionary intervention, leakages and inconsistent assessments.
For traders, however, the real test is whether the technology makes the system easier and faster to navigate. That is where revenue collection and trade facilitation begin to overlap.
Read also: CITN Lagos chairman targets stronger professional capacity, member engagement
The cost of moving goods
For Nigerian businesses, customs duties are only one part of the cost of importing or exporting goods.
Delays at ports, documentation requirements, inspections and logistics can add significantly to the final cost of doing business.
Customs has therefore, been expanding measures intended to reduce cargo clearance time, including 24-hour port operations and Time Release Studies designed to identify where delays occur between the arrival of cargo and its release.
The objective is to move away from a system where revenue collection and cargo clearance are seen as opposing interests.
A more efficient customs administration should, in theory, be able to collect the correct revenue while allowing compliant traders to move their goods faster.
The distinction is important. A trader who knows what duty is payable, can submit documents electronically, track the progress of a transaction and receive a predictable decision has less incentive to seek informal shortcuts.
That makes transparency a revenue issue as much as a governance issue.
Technology as the new customs infrastructure
The transformation underway at Customs goes beyond replacing paper with computers.
The Service is deploying non-intrusive inspection scanners, video analytics, geospatial surveillance and other technologies intended to give officers more information without relying entirely on physical inspection.
The underlying philosophy is risk management.
Rather than treating every shipment as equally suspicious, customs administrations increasingly use available data to identify cargo that presents a higher risk and allow compliant shipments to move with fewer interventions.
For Nigeria, where port congestion and cargo delays have long been concerns for businesses, the approach could have wider economic implications.
But technology does not automatically eliminate inefficiency.
Its success depends on the quality of data entering the system, the ability of officers and traders to use it, the reliability of the platforms and the willingness of institutions involved in the clearance chain to work together.
The reform therefore extends beyond Customs itself.
The security dimension
The other side of the agency’s mandate is less visible in revenue statistics.
Nigeria’s porous borders have long presented challenges involving arms, narcotics, smuggling and other prohibited goods. Customs officers are consequently operating in an environment where trade facilitation has to coexist with security enforcement.
The Service says intelligence-led operations and collaboration with other security agencies have helped it intercept prohibited goods at ports and borders.
This creates another delicate balance.
A customs administration that prioritises speed at all costs can create vulnerabilities. One that subjects every shipment to extensive checks can make legitimate trade prohibitively slow.
The objective is to distinguish between the two.
Technology, intelligence and risk profiling are increasingly important to achieving that balance because they allow enforcement resources to be concentrated on shipments considered more likely to pose a risk.
Can the reforms outlast individuals?
Perhaps the more consequential question surrounding the current Customs reforms is whether they can become institutional rather than personality-driven.
The Service has undergone several reform phases over the years. The challenge has often been maintaining improvements beyond individual leadership tenures.
The current emphasis on automation provides an opportunity to make some of these changes harder to reverse.
A digital system can standardise procedures in ways that individual directives cannot. Electronic records can also create an audit trail that makes transactions easier to review.
But technology must be accompanied by institutional discipline.
Systems need regular upgrades, officers need continuous training and traders need sufficient capacity to interact with digital platforms.
There is also the question of access. Smaller businesses and informal traders may not have the same capacity as large companies to navigate increasingly sophisticated digital trade systems.
A customs transformation that improves the experience of major importers but leaves smaller operators behind would produce an uneven outcome.
Looking beyond the numbers
The NCS has become an increasingly important source of non-oil revenue at a time when the Federal Government is under pressure to expand domestic revenue and reduce dependence on borrowing.
But the significance of the agency extends beyond how much it collects.
Every additional naira collected matters to the government’s fiscal position, but so does every hour saved in clearing legitimate cargo. Every seizure of prohibited goods matters to national security, while every reduction in discretionary interaction can improve confidence in the trading environment.
The challenge is that these outcomes sometimes pull in different directions.
Higher enforcement can mean more inspections. Faster clearance can create pressure to reduce interventions. Revenue mobilisation can create friction with traders. Industrial protection can conflict with the desire to facilitate imports.
Customs therefore sits at the centre of several policy trade-offs that cannot be solved by revenue collection alone.
Its next phase will be measured by how well it manages those tensions.
The growth in revenue provides one indicator.
The performance of B’Odogwu and other digital systems, cargo clearance times, compliance levels, the experience of legitimate traders and the effectiveness of border enforcement will provide others.
For an institution that once largely operated in the shadow of Nigeria’s wider fiscal and security debates, the Nigeria Customs Service is increasingly at the centre of both.
The task now is not simply to collect more. It is to build a customs system in which revenue, trade facilitation, transparency and security reinforce rather than undermine one another.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
Follow the story
