NPFL’s ambitious wage revolution faces harsh reality

The proposed introduction of a minimum monthly salary of 2 million for players in the Nigeria Premier Football League (NPFL), alongside a record 1 billion prize for the league champions, has been hailed as one of the boldest reforms ever conceived for Nigerian domestic football.

Yet, beneath the optimism surrounding the announcement lies a troubling question that has haunted the league for decades: can clubs that have struggled to pay modest wages suddenly sustain such ambitious financial commitments?

The reforms emerged from a high-level meeting involving the Chairman of the National Sports Commission (NSC), Mallam Shehu Dikko, NFF President Ibrahim Gusau and other top football stakeholders. Under the new reward structure, runners-up would receive 500 million while the third-placed team would earn 300 million. The package is designed to improve professionalism, enhance player welfare, attract investment and elevate the commercial value of the league.

According to the NSC, clubs that finish from fourth to 20th position will also benefit financially, ensuring that every team participating in the league receives a share of the improved revenue package.

The commission, however, did not disclose the specific amounts that will be allocated to clubs occupying positions fourth to 20th on the final league table.

Dikko maintained that players deserve a decent standard of living if the country hopes to build a league capable of commanding respect both locally and internationally.

“Players must earn a living wage. This is how we build a league that commands respect at home and abroad,” he said.

The vision behind the reforms is difficult to fault. Better remuneration would help stem the exodus of talented players to obscure leagues abroad and encourage young footballers to see the domestic league as a viable career path. However, history suggests that translating lofty ambitions into reality may prove far more complicated.

For decades, unpaid salaries have been one of the darkest stains on Nigerian football. Players and coaches have repeatedly found themselves battling clubs over months and sometimes years of outstanding wages and bonuses. Former officials of the defunct League Management Company (LMC) once disclosed that some salary debts dated back to 2004, with certain players passing away before receiving their entitlements.

Efforts to address the problem are hardly new. More than a decade ago, the LMC had introduced a minimum salary of 150,000 and proposed financial guarantees to ensure clubs fulfilled their obligations. The measures ultimately failed, largely because many clubs lacked the financial capacity to comply, while several players continued to earn far below the prescribed amount.

The Association of Professional Footballers of Nigeria has over the years pursued claims running into hundreds of millions of naira on behalf of players and coaches owed by clubs.

Endless protests over unpaid wages

Recent events suggest that the situation has changed a little. In 2022, Heartland players protested over 11 months of unpaid salaries, forcing the NFF to caution footballers against signing clearance forms that could jeopardise their claims. Three years later, Katsina United players publicly protested after being owed five months’ wages, once again exposing the fragile financial health of many clubs.

The NPFL subsequently threatened sanctions against clubs that ignored decisions of the NFF Players Status and Arbitration Committee concerning salary disputes. Yet the recurring nature of the problem underscores how the problem is deeply entrenched.

Against that backdrop, the proposed 2 million minimum wage raises significant questions about sustainability.

A 30-man squad earning the minimum amount would cost a club at least 60 million every month in salaries alone. Over a year, the wage bill would rise to 720 million, excluding expenses for coaches, technical staff, match bonuses, logistics, accommodation and administration.

For clubs whose survival depends almost entirely on allocations from state governments, such figures appear daunting.

Most NPFL clubs operate without substantial television revenue, merchandising structures, sponsorship portfolios or match-day income. Their fortunes are often tied to the financial priorities of their state governments, leading many analysts to argue that Nigerian clubs function more like public institutions than independent businesses.

Consequently, the introduction of a 1 billion prize fund may not necessarily resolve the league’s structural weaknesses. While the champions would receive a massive reward, only one club can emerge victorious. The remaining teams would still be expected to meet the proposed salary benchmark, meaning some clubs could find themselves carrying wage bills that exceed their annual revenues.

NPFL players deserve better deal – Oliseh, Eguavoen

Despite these concerns, there is broad consensus that Nigerian players deserve far better treatment.

Former Super Eagles captain Sunday Oliseh has repeatedly linked the mass migration of players abroad to poor welfare and inadequate remuneration.

“Football is a business,” Oliseh said. “It’s what he uses to pay his bills, feed his family, and plan his future.”

His remarks reflect the reality confronting many domestic players who often prefer relatively unknown leagues in Asia, Eastern Europe and North Africa to remaining in the NPFL.

A former Super Eagles coach, Augustine Eguavoen, has also defended the quality of players in the domestic league, insisting the issue is not talent but the environment in which they operate.

Dikko believes one of the solutions lies in restoring the league to mainstream television.

“Our players must be seen. Our league must be known. Television coverage is non-negotiable,” he said.

Many football economists share that view. Across the world, broadcast rights form the bedrock of football’s financial ecosystem, attracting sponsors, boosting fan engagement and creating sustainable revenue streams capable of supporting higher wages.

It’s a landmark initiative- Mouktar Mohammed

The Chairman of the Federal Capital Territory Football Association, Adam Mouktar Mohammed, has described the 1 billion prize money as a landmark initiative capable of repositioning Nigerian football.

“Full credit goes to the NSC, the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), and the NPFL for making a statement that matches the scale of our football potential,” he said.

However, Mohammed warned that prize money alone would not solve the league’s problems.

“A massive incentive is welcome, but it should not be mistaken for a fully functional football system,” he said.

“If the league is not commercially viable, properly televised, safe for players, and trusted by fans, the prize money alone will not transform it.”

He stressed that clubs must embrace sustainable business models supported by predictable revenues and professional management.

“The real objective should be building clubs that no longer struggle for survival but compete confidently on and off the pitch,” he added.

According to him, Nigeria possesses the talent, population and corporate strength to dominate African football, but has often been held back by poor governance and weak commercial discipline.

“What we have often lacked is transparency, accountability, and commercial discipline. This announcement can be a turning point if implementation matches the ambition,” Mohammed said.

He also urged banks, telecommunications companies, airlines, energy firms and media organisations to become long-term partners in football development.

“Our ambition should not be limited to offering the biggest prize money in Africa. We should focus on building the continent’s most watched, most trusted, and most talent-producing league. That is the real trophy.”

Speaking with Barau FC forward Joseph Atule who has backed the proposed 2 million minimum monthly salary for NPFL players, describing it as a major boost that could significantly improve the quality and competitiveness of the domestic league.

According to the former Lobi and Enyimba star, better remuneration would motivate players to perform at their highest level and help curb the growing trend of footballers seeking opportunities abroad.

“It is a morale booster to all the players because a player may not be able to give out his all because of poor pay.

“I believe if a player earns a minimum of N2 million, the league will be very competitive as each player will give his 100 per cent. Generally, earning N2m will bring out the best in you,” he said.

The forward acknowledged the challenges of playing in the domestic league and expressed hope that the proposal would be fully implemented.

“Playing in the league is not easy and I pray this is achieved. We will even see players from other countries coming to play in the NPFL and our players will not be looking to leave the country.

“I can tell you for a fact that my colleagues who went to other nations don’t earn more than N1.5m monthly. It is a welcome development,” Atule added.

He also expressed confidence that most clubs would be able to comply with the proposed salary structure, particularly those funded by state governments.

“The clubs owned by the government are the ones to even meet up the proposal. I believe every club can meet up since the government will release the money as far as every other club is doing the same. I see the government clubs meeting up than privately owned clubs,” he said.

The proposed 2 million minimum salary and 1 billion prize fund represent a defining moment for Nigerian football. They embody the desire to finally build a league that rewards players adequately and competes favourably with the best on the continent.

** But ambition alone does not guarantee success.**

Unless clubs develop sustainable sources of income and embrace genuine financial discipline, the promise of 2 million monthly salaries may simply become another chapter in the long history of noble ideas colliding with the harsh economic realities of Nigerian football.

Whether these reforms usher in a genuine revolution or remain an expensive dream will depend entirely on how effectively vision is matched with execution.